Bitfinex & Tether Responds to New York Supreme Court’s August 20 Ruling

On Monday (August 19), the New York Supreme Court denied Bitfinex and Tether’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit (against Bitfinex and Tether) initiated by the New York State Office of the Attorney General (“NYAGO”) due to lack of jurisdiction. On Tuesday (August 20), Tether issued its response.

This is how Judge Joel M. Cohen summarized the motion to dismiss in his decision:

“Respondents seek to terminate this Martin Act action on the ground that the Court lacks personal and subject matter jurisdiction. Specifically, they contend that their businesses (mainly, an off-shore cryptocurrency exchange and a ‘stablecoin’ currency called ‘tether’ purportedly backed by U.S. dollar reserves) do not have a connection to New York sufficient to trigger personal jurisdiction. They also contend that Petitioner’s ‘extraterritorial’ investigation into their business activities (which they claim does not involve ‘securities’ or ‘commodities’) is beyond the scope of her enforcement authority under the Act, and thus this Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction to facilitate that investigation.”

He then gave the New York Supreme Court’s ruling on this motion:

“… the Court finds based on the evidence and applicable law that it has jurisdiction – and a clear statutory mandate – to adjudicate this matter. Accordingly, Respondents’ motion is denied, and the temporary stay of the investigation is dissolved.”

This means that Bitfinex (or rather its parent company iFinex) and Tether must now fully comply with the previous order and provide all the documents requested by the NYAGO.

On Tuesday, Tether issued the following formal response to Judge Cohen’s decision:

“We appreciate Justice Cohen’s consideration of our motion in late July and his order released yesterday. While we are disappointed in the decision on our motion to dismiss, we will continue to vigorously defend against any action by the New York Attorney General’s office. We look forward to the opportunity to pursue these issues further in the appellate court.

“Any assertion that we have misled our customers about Tether (USDt), its backing, or about the negotiated transaction between Bitfinex and Tether is false. We remain committed, as ever, to protecting our customers, our business, and our community against the Attorney General’s meritless claims.”

What do you think?

345 points
Upvote Downvote

Written by Marjorie Contreras

I Love math & how math will help evolvable the new technology. After graduating as Engineer, I start learning about cryptography & blockchain programs. In order to perfect my skills and explore my passion for the blockchain industry, I have been working with many new startups which gave me new exposure in blockchain marketing and startup management.I am eager to join the next companies that I believe in and help them grow. Fin-Tech is where I am stationed at the moment. When I feel that I will be ready, I will move on to other industries and implement disruptive technologies over there so that out-dated systems and ideas will die out and these particular industries shall rise and will give to the community the best that they can present, create and implement.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *





Coinbase Becomes World’s Largest Cryptocurrency Custodian

Anthony Pompliano: Bitcoin is Going to End Up Being in Every Institutional Investor’s Portfolio”